|
The voice of the ANC must
be heard
When this
journal was first published seven years ago, in January 2001, we
said that it would make an important contribution towards filling a void
in South Africa's media landscape; a landscape in which the voices of the
majority of our people remain largely unheard.
As we noted at the Polokwane conference in December,
this situation has not changed much in the intervening period.
What we said in the launch edition of ANC Today
remains true today: "We are faced with the virtually unique situation
that, among the democracies, the overwhelmingly dominant tendency in South
African politics, represented by the ANC, has no representation whatsoever
in the mass media.
"We therefore have to contend with the situation that
what masquerades as 'public opinion', as reflected in the bulk of our
media, is in fact minority opinion informed by the historic social and
political position occupied by this minority."
There are many examples we can cite to illustrate this
point. Every day brings fresh instances of a media that, in general terms,
is politically and ideologically out of synch with the society in which it
exists.
This phenomenon is most starkly illustrated at those
moments in our political cycle when the people of South Africa get an
opportunity to elect parties and individuals they want to represent them
in government.
In both the 2004 national and provincial elections and
the 2006 local elections, the views of voters were shown to be sharply at
odds with the 'views' emanating from most media.
To an uninformed reader, listener or viewer, following
media coverage in the months and weeks leading up to these elections, it
would have appeared patently obvious that the leading party in government,
the ANC, was heading for a hiding. Though unlikely to be defeated, most
media commentators concurred, the ANC would see its support drop
significantly in the face of an electorate that had become disenchanted.
We were told that only the ANC's "struggle credentials" and the lack of a
credible opposition would save it from outright defeat at the polls. The
election results proved these reports wrong. In both 2004 and 2006, not
only did the ANC's share of the vote increase, but also the actual numbers
of people who voted for the organisation increased. Voters did not desert
the ANC, and instead gave it a stunning 70% mandate!
The outcome of the 52nd national conference in Polokwane
is a most recent example of the media yet again becoming a victim of its
own propaganda and manipulation. Some are correctly asking themselves:
"how did we get it so wrong?", while others now use every opportunity to
"prove" that there is something that was seriously wrong with ANC
delegates at Polokwane. Granted there are some journalists who report
fairly and leave it to the readers to make their own judgements about
issues and individuals, without pushing certain agendas. We must
acknowledge and applaud their professionalism.
These are not merely examples of faulty analysis of
public opinion surveys, or a simple misreading of the mood. They indicate
a general trend within most mainstream media institutions to adopt
positions, cloaked as sober and impartial observation, that are
antagonistic to the democratic movement and its agenda for fundamental
social, political and economic transformation.
To understand why this is the case, we need to consider
the role of the media in society in general and the specific circumstances
of the media in South Africa, both past and present.
In a discussion document entitled 'Transformation of the
media', circulated as part of preparations for the ANC National Policy
Conference in June last year, we said:
"The reality is that the media - in South Africa as in
every other society -is a major arena in the battle of ideas. All social
forces are therefore engaged, to varying degrees and with differing
success, in efforts to ensure that the media advances their ideological,
political, social, economic and cultural objectives.
"Throughout its history the ANC has engaged in the
battle of ideas, understanding that the achievement of its objectives of a
united, non-racial, non-sexist and democratic South Africa is dependent on
its capacity to convince the people of the correctness of its positions,
policies and programmes.
"The media is consequently one of the sites of
ideological struggle with which the ANC - like other social actors - has
sought to engage."
Contrary to what some may claim, the media is not simply
a product of the work of disinterested observers - professionals who are
able to detach themselves from their personal views, interests, prejudices
and social position and present the world as it objectively is.
It is instead a product of the various political,
social, economic and cultural forces that exist within a society. It is a
battle of ideas, and, as such, the media is part of the battle for power.
Those with power, particularly economic power, are keen that the media
serves to reinforce their privileged position, while those who seek a more
equitable distribution of resources campaign for a media that serves the
cause of a more equitable society.
The media, viewed in its totality, should be as diverse
as the society which it serves and reflects. This is clearly not the case
in South Africa today. At times, the media functions as if they are an
opposition party.
In part, this can be explained by the structure, culture
and values of the media inherited from apartheid, and by the commercial
forces that drive most media institutions.
As we observed in the discussion document cited
above:
"The freedom of the South African media is today
undermined not by the state, but by various tendencies that arise from the
commercial imperatives that drive the media. "The concentration of
ownership, particularly in the print sector, has a particularly
restrictive effect on the freedom of the media. The process of
consolidation and the drive to cut costs through, among other things,
rationalisation of newsgathering operations, leads to homogenisation of
content.
"Despite protestations to the contrary, there are an
increasing number of instances where the supposedly-sacred separation
between management and the newsroom is breached, where commercial
considerations influence editorial content.
"This takes place in a media market in which there is
fierce competition for a slice of the upper income market, where the most
advertising revenue is to be found. Given that this end of the market
represents very particular class interests (and is predominantly white) it
stands to reason that media institutions will tend to reflect the
preoccupations, values and world view of this small group of society. Even
where management may adopt a hands-off approach to editorial matters, they
would certainly step in to prevent their title from adopting an editorial
stance that may antagonise their target market or alienate advertisers.
Dedicated professionals that they may be, most editors still need to keep
an eye on the bottom line."
This is one of the reasons why, though there may be
plenty of newspapers and magazines on our news stands, and a multitude of
radio and TV stations occupying our airwaves, the overall orientation of
South African media is politically conservative. There are few, if any,
mainstream media outlets that articulate a progressive left perspective -
which is endorsed at each election by the majority of South Africans and
represented by the ANC, its allies and the broader democratic
movement.
It was to answer this deficiency that the 52nd National
Conference called for the movement to develop its own media platforms,
making use of available technology, to articulate its positions and
perspectives directly to the people. This needs to take place alongside
the effort to transform the South African media environment so that it
becomes more representative of the diversity of views and interests in
society, more accessible to the majority of the people, and less beholden
to commercial interests.
During the course of the next five years, as has been
mandated by Conference, we will pursue the development of these media
platforms. We will also continue to develop ANC Today as a
credible, popular and vibrant expression of the views and perspectives of
the African National Congress. The journal will remain at the heart of the
ANC's contribution to the battle of ideas.
Over the next few weeks and months, readers should
expect to see a number of changes in ANC Today, all intended to
improve the relevance, vibrancy and impact of this weekly read.
The Letter from the President will now be published on
special occasions only, dealing with important themes and events during
the course of the year. The intention is to open up the journal to a
diversity of voices, articulating ANC positions. In this regard, there
will be weekly contributions from ANC Officials and NEC members.
As we introduce these changes, we will continue to
encourage and value the feedback we receive from readers, better to ensure
that the voice of the ANC is heard.
ANC Today will be an authoritative online voice
of the African National Congress and a platform for the accurate
expression of the policies and views of our movement. We trust that the
diversity of contributors will encourage more debate, and promote better
understanding of the movement and its programmes and activities.

|