Advice on Science and Religion





True religion and honest science are one and the same, for truth is truth. Science is not a body of knowledge. Science is a method for testing the truth value of an hypothesis or theory. For a claim to be true scientifically, it has to be repeatable, fallible, and empirical. That which claims its understanding to be beyond that of a free thinking person's capacity for reason, is esoteric, and not science. No person should consider such a perspective to have any value. All complexity can always be simplified, given sufficient time and energy for rational enquiry.
For a claim to be religiously true, it must simply be true. Thus science can test the validity of religion, in the same way that scientism and its dogma is an open target for religious uprising. For truth is truth, regardless of how it is tested, or how it is attested to.
The Christ's message of an afterlife, of Divine judgment, and a second death of the soul itself, or alternatively everlasting life, is true in a manner which has been repeated billions of times throughout time as countless individuals have been enraptured by the truth of this vision. The message is fallible, in that those who embrace it thrive, whereas those who do not, suffer. Any community that tries to move outside of this idea goes the way of Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan, Zionism, Apartheid South Africa, the Soviet Union, or the United States of Busherica.
And knowledge of Christ is empirical, in that the likes of Saint Paul have turned their lives around completely. The empirical wealth and power of the west can only be attributed to the Christ. The relative material and moral poverty of the rest of the world is hard evidence, the like of which has never before been seen on such a grand scale of comparison.
So for what reason should politics be any different from science or religion? All attest to truth, understanding and reason, and uplifting the life of the community. Democracy on the other hand is devoid of truth in the same way that gross polytheism is. If different beliefs, polytheistically, give rise to conflict, how can we hope that differing political parties are going to do any better? Especially as these so-called secular states have rejected the notion of an over-arching holistic ordering principle, like God, to stop them from destroying one another. The concept of a secular state is no different from the proverbial bull in a China shop, with National egos happily consuming nations by the million. All the religious intolerance of history is a hiccup by comparison to the malaise of Nationalist governments that have plagued the world, over just the last handful of decades.
Why should the blind, unreasonable, unaccountable, and untestable alleged validity of a 'secret' ballot hold sway over our lives?? Why should the alleged 51% hold power over the 49%? Whether these divisions are based on the divisive political truth of democracy, or the divisive religious truth of polytheism, or on the belaglike idea of subjectively separate academic truth, makes no difference.
Divisions in politics allow a minority of elite professional politicians to live like parasites off society, who compete fruitlessly in a race with few winners. Monopoly of truth, centralization of power and dictatorship are not the opposite of a divided society. Such situations are the result of a divided society that uses the concept of one size fits all, when it clearly and simply does not. Monopoly is dominance of power of the one (mono) over the many (poly).
Divinity is the recognition of holism that does not separate power from the people. Science, religion, and politics are all faces of ideology, and are in fact systems managing an economy. An economy is in effect a meta-philosophy for determining and dispensing environmental and psychological energy, as we experience the material and spiritual in the living metaphysic.
Ideals, Ideas and Ideology are logical blueprints that we use to make numerous quick decisions that have day-to-day life-threatening ramifications. I know theft is wrong, intrinsically to my religion, so I am not ever tempted by the hundreds of opportunities for theft that pass me by in the supermarket. Nor am I tempted by adultery. My life is free of these burdens, I breeze through the day without entrapment in every possible self-worshipping vanity of the materialist ideology.
Competition is within the nature of our universe. But unity of verse is a more persuasive notion than the divisive separation of purpose that democracy espouses. Democracy has some limited value in that it is espionage as opposed to open warfare. Either way it is still conflict, its just that now the thug that out-thinks the other thug, takes the loot. Nothing new. But ultimately the sharing of the loot becomes the norm, so overt conflict based ideology like democracy or polytheism, out-rationalise themselves. The Bush-Gore vote proved that America is only a democracy on the surface, as the one with the most votes, lost the election. Zimbabwe is less pretentious about its dictatorship, and yet China, the failed communist state, outshines them all. Due to the simplification of its political process, it slipstreams perfectly behind the Christian American market. For now leastways (February 2006).
Established business like sewerage and water does not require an election. Neither do farming or construction. Imagine if we voted on these issues and 49% of water projects, sanitation and farm produce was discarded, or the fruit thereof handed to the 'winner'? This sounds ridiculous, but we waste 49% of our political power when one side loses an election. And in multi-party democracy it is often less than a quarter who retain power. And real political issues, like public health and law, are diluted by the democratic process so that minorities always lose out. Noble causes that lack popular support or understanding have no chance. Not so, even in the relatively primitive government of Monarchy which solidifies religion, politics, and science into one cohesive body of commerce, welfare, and Justice.
So long as they work, monolithic political structures will be as powerful as monotheistic religion. Monotheism is ironically better understood in a metaphysic that recognizes all the faces of god, as being: The Face of God. Poseidon is Christ, the sea God, who warns of the next flood. The problem with scientism like Buddhism and other dogma, is that they deny the face of the other. The Buddha is blind to the real spirit world, as is the atheist. And so too those monotheists who deny other religions. In the name of monotheism they recreate the divisions of polytheism!
Competition does stimulate growth, albeit with the inevitability of decisive conflict. The space race in its infancy will yield readily to competition. But the problem of cooperation, should ensure that the makers of air-locks be a monopoly, for safety reasons that can not be guaranteed any other way. In the same way, Microsoft as a monopoly must never be resisted. If conflicting operating systems were to be the basis of the information technology world, communication would descend into unworkable chaos. I estimate personally that at least half of virus attacks are attacks on the Microsoft monopoly. It is, of course, only possible that such attacks can happen, because of Microsoft's effective ability to supply a universal platform in the first instance. Those that attack Microsoft are hacking off their own root and lifeline.
The world of fashion, is the opposite as do other arts and creative living pursuits. Justice, however, in the face of the ever-diminishing individual, is something that cannot be open to a vote. Neither can it be independent of the people whom it serves.
Consider homosexuality. The rights of homosexuals have been given special attention as they are often the victim of violent attack. But attacks on such people are worse than ever. As would be the case of any person who is suffering a mental illness who is put in a position of power. These people obviously cannot make rational decisions, and yet their rights are often placed above that of heterosexuals. As children are raped, the authorities waste everyone's time with the inanity of homosexual marriage. Legal authorities, and even church ministers are permitted to be blindly stupid. How is the victim of a sex-pervert supposed to react with anything but anger in the face of such blatant mindless selfishness? If people suffering from Down's syndrome were made into politicians, priests, and parents, they would also suffer such attacks. Should we entrust financial planning to someone with Alzheimer's disease? By all means do not demonize the faggots, but do not hold them up as leaders, out of misguided kindness, for then they will be attacked. This is the law of natural selection.
Bringing the issue out into the open, will help in the long run, for homosexuality is the result of prolonged sexual attack. Normally by opposite gender parent, but there was also the poor bugger who had six older sisters, and was as queer as a duck with webbed wings and feathers on its feet. Poor sod. But pretending that it is ok, then sniggering behind the twisted creatures back does nobody any good. The emperor not only has no clothes, but he is a downright idiot, and pea-brained faggot to boot.
A justice system which does not regard the over-arching principle of Reason and Universal Order, is a bunch of blithering fools.

 



 

What proof of God?
Without God there is no reason. By asking a question you imply that a reasonable answer is forthcoming, thus you imply the existence of God, by admitting that reason exists.
Proof for God:
Darwin's last act of reason was to convert to Christianity.
Irrefutable proof of God:
Pi

 

 

 

 

 

 

Philosophy of Physical Science

 

 

BACKGROUND FRACTAL FROM
WWW.SOFTWARE-MULTIMEDIA.COM